Jump to content

Identify the Fan No.11


Steve Rockwell

Recommended Posts

The "EE Fan" is of different
design but does have the
same base as the others.

Edited by Jim Kovar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you teasing? The Randolph Daisy and Splitdorf appear to have Lieb motors on them. Is Lieb recognized for that fan motor you pictured, or Edison?

Edit: R. J. Randolph appears to have been an electrical engineer representing a sales office for the Excelsior Electric Co. at the Rookery(?) at the time of introduction of the Randolph Daisy. 

That has to be a Lieb motor.

Edited by Russ Huber
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can about guarantee you there won't be another post on this post for an ID. What manufacturer is listed on your image, please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

     Answers:   Lieb is Good.  Edison is Good... I won't say better...

 

656800932_EdisonFanMotorLabel.png.299e9c1ea8f914201ff9fa3b2ca7deb0.png

 

     But

 

        That brings, considering the thread excerpted above, the total of potential answers to five. Let's immediately narrow that to four, because the "E.E." fan is a red herring...

258980072_E.E.FanforAFCA.jpg.8be841dcef8f495af32c5cb11402cff2.jpg

 

        The field of choices becomes Randolph, Splitdorf, Edison and Lieb. All display essentially the same motor, making time of announcement a factor in precedence and naming. Chronologically, the first announcement is that of an Edison fan manufactured by Lieb in The Electrical World of 27 Jun 1891.

1527199435_27Jun1891ElectricalWorld-NewEdisonFanMotorcopy.thumb.png.d59ff4aba0dc83a8e83673b78a730fa4.png 

 

     I've found no attribution of design anywhere in any of these fans' production by the way... something which bothers me... I hope someone turns up something. This New Edison Fan Motor does not appear to utilize the commutator brushes for which Lieb had just received a patent, US454488, merely four days before the magazine announcement, somewhat puzzling.

     Enlarging the engraving provides an image of an Edison General Electric tag... whether imaginative or a real depiction I wouldn't venture...

583721218_27Jun1891ElectricalWorld-EdisonFanTag.png.3a67561b41cadba1d93241d80ed6a54e.png

 

     Here's a clip from October 1891 which at least lends credence to the idea of there being a Lieb-named fan... 

686166648_28Oct1891ElectricalEngineer-LiebFanMotorcopy.png.00b04b4ea5ca1867067376c21e7634c8.png

 

     And now is when those marvelous modern Lieb photos provide useful evidence, because there's no denying that such a thing as a Lieb fan exists having the tag pic right there to behold. Before returning to this subject, let's take up the other two choices mentioned above: Randolph and Splitdorf.

 

      

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Steve Rockwell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

     I got timed-out yet again, and so will have to split this discourse into bite-sized chunks. 

 

Sequentially, the Randolph announcement is the next one, coming March & April 1892...

572907876_19Mar1892WesternElectrician-RandolphDaisy.thumb.png.56df7138ee7243a58ede2cd6e0a37e79.png

1496240591_Apr1892ElectricalIndustries-RandolphDaisyFancopy.thumb.png.ed5994a3e16936fa9936cce5a21c51d5.png

1721990968_16Apr1892ElectricalReview-RandolphDaisyFan.png.412ff65b45c0f7e4677bedde1de0798b.png

 

     Language similar to that describing the Lieb is used... brought out, made, manufactured... no hint of designed or invented in any of the copy.

     All secondary sources indicate that Randolph would or could not have produced the fans but again that conclusion can be easily refuted with a single citation. What can be said about Randolph is that he was noted for selling all kinds of electrical gear.

117506332_20Feb1895Electricity-RandolphBio.thumb.png.2f581740eeb07f003bfd7f6a2a4e08b4.png

 

1936940425_May1892ElectricalIndustries-Randolph.png.4e9b559497135c6795c80944fb85a686.png

1217055009_Sep1892ElectricalIndustries-Randolph.png.27d31ecd50d08ffe4793987d81cea8f3.png

2135582737_Oct1894ElectricalEngineering-Randolph.thumb.png.8a25816a041c51b1eaba7366bc744e87.png

 

     I'm not sure how long the Randolph fan was produced, but I'm rejecting it as the answer for good reason as you'll see.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Steve Rockwell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

        Splitdorf's announcement is dated the Fourth of August 1894. Once again, the subject of the article is listed as the manufacturer, though in this instance a two year history is part of the article.

     Splitdorf the Elder had been active in electricity as early as the 1850's; he became well-known for his insulated wire production in particular.

1241638636_2Nov1916AmericanMachinist-SplitdorfObit.png.e32186bf217cd330530c54454139d091.png

1898501170_Oct1916TheMotortruck-SplitdorfDeath.png.d5220de30cee3455ec9672a3f009094c.png

 

This is from The Telegrapher, 31 Jul 1865

248260072_31Jul1865TheTelegrapher-JamesClarkCo.(Splitdorf).png.be2c6cd88ce2ea45c7f0ce221683eb83.png

1281197142_22Mar1884ElectricalWorld-SplitdorfWire.png.aed5c0440648f489eafec84df66d9836.png

202380656_Feb1887ElectricalEngineer-SplitdorfInsulatedWireCo..png.2a59ac49e4ed77ea7014df2487e1436e.png

 

 

 

     Later, and particularly in the twentieth century, the two sons moved the family business strongly into the automotive-electrical field, where they became a well-known name.

16704122_15Oct1903AmericanInventor-Splitdorf.png.a5bcce32a185117c1dea2910adaa274e.png

 

     This is Trow's Directory 1914

838059487_1914TrowsDirectory-Splitdorf.png.042a69b283bcf509b020043a335a72ae.png

 

 

   So there's a heritage of electrical experience within that family, but I've not encountered the sort of evidence to give further credit to them beyond having produced the fans as depicted in the Jim Kovar excerpt far above. 

 

 

 

Edited by Steve Rockwell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

       All of which brings us back to Lieb and Edison. The early archival photo (dated 17 Oct 1892) is not capable of the extreme zooming that many of the historical GE photos are, but I enlarged and rotated the tag portion in order to compare it with the Lieb tag photo, and I believe the old pic carries the same Lieb tag, not Edison General Electric as the engraving in Electrical World depicts...

1174263332_Photo1177EnhancedTag.png.b35972ede76a02c8484cb6029ce9d744.png

531740772_LiebMachineWorksTagcopy.png.4df610fb86abea232fedeecc4091102e.png

 

        The layout, the spacing, the "W" I perceive, rivet location--- all suggest to me that's a Lieb tag.

 

        Now, whether that's a Lieb fan or an Edison fan, that's a hair I'm not prepared to split right now. We have to throw into the mix the fact that it was during this period of time that two of the big three merged, forming the General Electric Company, and the Edison electrical companies by that name disappeared. Both Charles A. Lieb and Splitdorf, whether the father Henry or the two electrical sons Charles & John (it was Charles who manufactured the motor) were capable of designing and bringing to production a motor such as these. I don’t believe the same can be said of Randolph, reinforcing the idea that this fan is not any of his original work.

 

   It’s within the realm of possibility that a third party— take Hochhausen as a possible example, or Eickemeyer or Sprague— designed the motor, and Lieb, later Randolph, later still Splitdorf were licensed to build and even market it… speculation I admit. But Lieb Randolph and Splitdorf, as well as Excelsior, all had interactions and/or intertwined ownership with the General Edi-Thom-son group. There has to be good reason these essentially identical fans came under those different names…

 

     I don't know for fact but presume that all Edison fan work prior to the amalgamation became property of G.E., and that Edison had motivation, if he wished to remain involved in these electrical ventures, he would have to come up with fans of his own. I'd wish to be corrected if I have any of this wrong, but because the slo-motors preceded amalgamation and were produced in Schenectady (best of my knowledge or best guess?) they became G.E. property not Edison, as would these fan motors in this thread... perhaps explaining the multiple production under various names, and explaining the fresh Edison ventures with battery fans, C-Frames and Ironclads........

 

1577277419_IdentifytheFan11Full.thumb.png.409a230ff9d4dd41d9ccf1ff3e41a854.png

 

Edited by Steve Rockwell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Facts..........this was ahead of Randolph and Splitdorf, who with little doubt were agents for the fans. Lieb designed it, Edison manufactures it and takes credit, what is new. Fact Jack.

1577277419_IdentifytheFan11Full.thumb.png.409a230ff9d4dd41d9ccf1ff3e41a854.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Lieb designed it, Edison manufactures it and takes credit, what is new. Fact Jack.

 

     That's what I was trying to get at, Russ...  Is that substantiated, or assumption based on the marketing timeline?

 

 

Like so many other electricians of the period, Lieb put a great deal of his effort into traction/transit work, where such a considerable portion of investment capital was going... following the money, as well as the greater public good...

1396850622_LiebPatentsListing.thumb.png.5c38bb394fa0c923ea9b52403fc6925d.png

1665562264_1Oct1904ElectricalReview-Lieb.png.a904fa89ff9d8a31e1a65c915de5e31e.png

 

 

       I'm finding some interesting inter-connections from that period of time-- early 90's--between Charles A. Lieb and Sprague and, of course, GE.....

default103-Lieb.thumb.jpeg.ac5f0a23031eb327635740b30bbe6b75.jpeg

1207971814_AFCA11-A.png.ebc9c37a0f5220fc645e6d451a079831.png

1501145756_Lavensv_Lieb.png.065ff86e535fc4544fbda2e7928a6c85.png

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Steve Rockwell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Steve Rockwell said:

 Lieb designed it, Edison manufactures it and takes credit, what is new. Fact Jack.

 

     That's what I was trying to get at, Russ...  Is that substantiated, or assumption based on the marketing timeline?

 

        I'm finding some interesting inter-connections from that period of time-- early 90's--between Charles A. Lieb and Sprague.....

"Edison manufactures" ?

 

So, am I not reading
the below right?

Especially the two
prepositional phrases
"for-" and "by-."

Screenshot_20220511-002134_Drive.thumb.jpg.fc2cf900caad3fd4b7bbf9553dd0d667.jpg

Edited by Jim Kovar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jim Kovar said:

"Edison manufactures" ?

 

So, am I not reading
the below right?

Especially the two
prepositional phrases
"for-" and "by-."

Screenshot_20220511-002134_Drive.thumb.jpg.fc2cf900caad3fd4b7bbf9553dd0d667.jpg

I think figurative is the word, Jim.  I am simply implying Edison never seemed to fail to have his best interests in mind. 🙂

Lieb Fan Better Picture 3.jpg

1577277419_IdentifytheFan11Full.thumb.png.409a230ff9d4dd41d9ccf1ff3e41a854.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Edison had manufactured
it, his inflated ego wouldn't
allow another's name to be
on it, exclusively.    JMO.

1747805426_LiebFanBetterPicture3.jpg.44d9b453064ff9d33e8d32102b76b263.jpg

Edited by Jim Kovar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

     I'll say essentially the same thing, but differently: When didn't Edison put his name on a product? Some of those C-Frames carry the famous signature as well, Thomas was not shy about self-promotion...

 

   Which is suggestive that the fan should be viewed as Lieb.

376889530_26Sep1891ElectricalWorld-LiebMachineWorks.thumb.png.16f9570b5716eb2d2eaf679d9b4b0b1d.png

     I'm pretty-well convinced now that Lieb left his fan interests to Splitdorf, in order to concentrate on his street railway work and businesses, and Splitdorf was then able to promote the fan in his own name... (where are examples?)

     Read the excerpt above carefully, and I think you'll agree with me.

 

            Randolph likely came by his access due to years spent working within the Thomson-Houston sphere, and it may have been a case like Russ described earlier...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1682262774_AFCA11-New.thumb.png.171fb30018bfa71abba1bee0d9a58f97.png

1033655860_1892NYCDirectory-LiebSplitdorf.png.a93a4f58088c17a7be6e42a901c29573.png

1845898228_1892NewYorkCityRecord.png.a8d51bc5b6cc6584b327976ccd670d97.png

5023304_1892NYCDirectory-Splitdorf.png.35d9d23f5d71a514b3a0d034cb4831e7.png

1045531016_1894FactoryReport-LiebSplitdorf.thumb.png.d74a15b9a510051d65499439e98d173e.png

 

 

 

 

 

648932555_1900Census-Lieb.thumb.png.16522c94e96ef50c8225ecd0f5c6223b.png

1206169529_1905NYCensus-Lieb.thumb.png.7b840a0557e5958f04ba23dcb5046f79.png

 

 

 

On 5/11/2022 at 8:04 AM, Steve Rockwell said:

Like so many other electricians of the period, Lieb put a great deal of his effort into traction/transit work, where such a considerable portion of investment capital was going... following the money, as well as the greater public good...

489312386_1Oct1904ElectricalReview-Lieb.png.0d8bf25ffaeaf5549f5b2ab889e3bd0a.png

 

 

 

Quote: 1274215287_AFCA11-B.thumb.png.dee63415b6a7523301e75deb69f394e0.png

 

            It still remains to be seen precisely who designed the motor, and we may never know... It could have been a third party, possibly an Edison employee/affiliate, with the production contract then placed with Lieb and Splitdorf who, like Bergman, supplied other electrical gear to NY, the US and the EGE...

     It was Lieb's manufactory, hence the priority given the Lieb Machine tag?

 

        If Lieb had produced it independently and proposed selling through the Edison organization, seems to me the Edison name would have been displayed..... prominently.

 

        This fan is still a puzzle awaiting solution........

 

 

 

Edited by Steve Rockwell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...