Jump to content

30s JW Gosling GE Quiet fan


Jason Stever

Recommended Posts

Congrats Jason - Great fan!!!  I'm not really into the art deco or vintage fans therefore focus on the Cast Iron/Brass blade fans.  However, that GE fan (55x164) was an exception for me, much like you, a favorite/bucket list fan which I finally acquired one earlier this year.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Steve Rockwell said:

        Got a paper tag under that base? I try to make sense of serial numbers.....

Unfortunately, long gone 😞 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mike Aidinovich said:

Congrats Jason - Great fan!!!  I'm not really into the art deco or vintage fans therefore focus on the Cast Iron/Brass blade fans.  However, that GE fan (55x164) was an exception for me, much like you, a favorite/bucket list fan which I finally acquired one earlier this year.    

55x164 that’s it. I couldn’t remember ! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

     Thanks Michael. I really can't read the number; my imagination says it's R24675. It would be good to know authoritatively...

   I may as well spit this out here, as good a place as any, with Jason's shiny blade above to inspire. Bottom right corner of the label reads J-442A superseding J-442.

   Same as happened with the 55x164 and the 55x164B, the labels for this 55x164G underwent transition, and were denoted to indicate those changes with a different label designation bottom right, printing date lower left... that's May 1933 if the round-head screw didn't obscure the final two numerals.

   My recent insight is this (and if anyone has confirmation or refutation, I'd be glad to know of it): the (2M) I believe to indicate a printing of 2,000 labels.

   Other labels for 55x164, labels GEJ-436, -436A & -436B, according to this theory, had two runs of (2M), and a run of (5500).

   With 55x164B, I don't have a GEJ-439 sighting, only -439A with  (1700). [They just didn't commonly use figures such as 5.5M or 1.7M in the early thirties]

   The earliest tags had the c.s. number (spec.) hand-written. Alpha-numerics sometimes lack the letter component.

image.png.9aef75e4ace6c6d568deab4db457cb86.png

image.thumb.png.f7e26abb87f36232f54d8d3204cec22b.png

image.thumb.png.c8c4ca5a7e9462e1ac49b403a3e3a2ba.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

image.thumb.jpeg.9ed7a50b8aeba799e96c79e5403c806e.jpeg

 

 

So Jason, these are the Graybars:

image.png.f1ecde0bdf3347e729a5e23d1b493d34.png

image.thumb.jpeg.f73188a317232c3d3bde0eb8ac80e103.jpeg

image.png.829ced8b68e3b236239999cd0849ed07.png

image.png.8260a6d4f5b14a76fc278eda63b25e02.png

 

                                                                               Does this stand up to scrutiny?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Steve Rockwell said:

     Thanks Michael. I really can't read the number; my imagination says it's R24675. It would be good to know authoritatively...

   I may as well spit this out here, as good a place as any, with Jason's shiny blade above to inspire. Bottom right corner of the label reads J-442A superseding J-442.

   Same as happened with the 55x164 and the 55x164B, the labels for this 55x164G underwent transition, and were denoted to indicate those changes with a different label designation bottom right, printing date lower left... that's May 1933 if the round-head screw didn't obscure the final two numerals.

   My recent insight is this (and if anyone has confirmation or refutation, I'd be glad to know of it): the (2M) I believe to indicate a printing of 2,000 labels.

   Other labels for 55x164, labels GEJ-436, -436A & -436B, according to this theory, had two runs of (2M), and a run of (5500).

   With 55x164B, I don't have a GEJ-439 sighting, only -439A with  (1700). [They just didn't commonly use figures such as 5.5M or 1.7M in the early thirties]

   The earliest tags had the c.s. number (spec.) hand-written. Alpha-numerics sometimes lack the letter component.

image.png.9aef75e4ace6c6d568deab4db457cb86.png

image.thumb.png.f7e26abb87f36232f54d8d3204cec22b.png

image.thumb.png.c8c4ca5a7e9462e1ac49b403a3e3a2ba.png

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

image.thumb.jpeg.9ed7a50b8aeba799e96c79e5403c806e.jpeg

 

 

So Jason, these are the Graybars:

image.png.f1ecde0bdf3347e729a5e23d1b493d34.png

image.thumb.jpeg.f73188a317232c3d3bde0eb8ac80e103.jpeg

image.png.829ced8b68e3b236239999cd0849ed07.png

image.png.8260a6d4f5b14a76fc278eda63b25e02.png

 

                                                                               Does this stand up to scrutiny?

I am still trying to process all the above details let alone scrutinize. I think everybody should just pack and ship their Gosling design GE to Steve. I bet he would like that. I would. 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

..... all that pedantry because I think  2M  stands for 2,000.....

 

 I think everybody should just pack and ship their Gosling design GE to Steve. I bet he would like that. I would. 

          Well, Thanks Russ, I can't argue, your logic is flawless. Still I won't get my hopes up, if it happens it happens........

Edited by Steve Rockwell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

        I forgot to post this last night, just discovered it yesterday, a fresh insight to the relationship between Graybar (by that time, effectively, the Western Electric's Supply Dept.) and GE.

   If Graybar weren't stated to be employee-owned, I'd have thought GE had a financial position there, since I don't know of other companies having an office within the Works...

     The article, dated 11 Aug 1932, concerns the demolition of an old building at a corner of the site.....

image.jpeg.40411b452992ab6ef15fb522fec01305.jpeg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...