Jump to content

R & M Stationary modernistic Peacock fan


Anthony Lindsey

Recommended Posts

FWIW.....I was able to pull up a bunch of Google book snippets supporting this fan. Not one supports a stationary model. But these are not full read books. Mike Kearns may have a better angle with old paper access.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Belden Soft Rubber Plug CANNOT BREAK The Belden Soft Rubber Plug is fully covered by patents in the United States and many foreign countries. Its construction is unique. It is, today, the accepted standard of the electrical ...

 

1498696117115152066-02205186 (storage.googleapis.com)

1498389847697221311-02173820 (storage.googleapis.com)

US2205186-drawings-page-1.png

US2173820-drawings-page-1.png

20230822_092348.thumb.jpg.b83e251301ca016f61eae3e54e774ea6.jpg

Edited by Russ Huber
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comparing this fan to an oscillator, I would say it’s a copy or a homemade repair job.   The rear guard looks like a screen instead of cast.  Also why make a different base and put the switch in the motor?   Besides  having no tag, the motor is backwards compared to the oscillator.   Just my two cents, not worth a nickel.   🤷‍♂️

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good points.

Here are some close up pictures as well as the bottom of the base.  Is that a cast #?

The motor is cast onto the rear cover it appears. 

The base looks the same except it never had a hole in it for a switch.

 

20231008_164144.jpg

20231008_164200.jpg

20231008_164210.jpg

20231008_164228.jpg

20231008_164303.jpg

20231008_164316.jpg

20231008_164337.jpg

20231008_164414.jpg

20231008_164429.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

        Anthony,

   Thanks, we had needed more photos... badly.

   I really liked Steve Butler's observations and comments. My reaction was: if that's home-made, that home-maker is really good... because that appears to be up to professional standards--- after all, the front hangs off the rear and all are supported by those connections to the motor frame. Now, with fresh grist for contemplation, but without time right this moment, I plan to mull it over and study it again tonight... Any likelihood/possibility of it being prototypical? That's a lot of work to replace what became the stock item and to avoid oscillation...

   Would appreciate seeing even greater details of the above mentioned attachments, and the connection to the base as in the third-to-last photo.....

                                                        image.thumb.png.630e80a3e0b23991b00fcecafb9c0bc0.png

image.thumb.png.f114b96172756faa83cc4ee9701862de.png

                                                                             image.jpeg.2c047f3275c677c9137d16f91b3957b8.jpeg  

                                                                              image.jpeg.aaa5fa17aa515c1d649741d6f833dc23.jpeg

Edited by Steve Rockwell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well....I didn't notice before but the rear cage and motor housing are brass or bronze 

Front cage is not and magnet does not stick.  Pot metal I assume. 

Base is cast iron and magnet sticks.

Rear motor cover is stamped steel 

20231008_174226.jpg

20231008_174232.jpg

20231008_174240.jpg

20231008_174249.jpg

20231008_174330.jpg

20231008_174319.jpg

20231008_174315.jpg

20231008_174304.jpg

20231008_174338.jpg

20231008_174345.jpg

20231008_174350.jpg

20231008_174355.jpg

20231008_174423.jpg

20231008_174416.jpg

20231008_174409.jpg

20231008_174402.jpg

20231008_174538.jpg

20231008_174924.jpg

20231008_174952.jpg

20231008_175020.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is some damning evidence for a prototype. #1. is its well-done construction. The switch toggle and mounting on Anthony's stationary "appears" to match the switch on the oscillator. With a stroke of luck the internal part of the switch on Anthony's may have a patent date stamped on it. 

20231008_174416.thumb.jpg.3e03a6890f6d7e18c426ed3613679e49.jpg

1_f606b6802a9532db5cbbb1fa144828f3 (2).jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe it does.  It is a small rectangular bakelite box and looks just like the one in the picture above with the fan broken out.   I had to take it apart to get it to run as it was pretty stuck at first.    This fan was with the 1901 Searchlight fan.   Along with a RM speaker fan and the DC Lollipop.

Edited by Anthony Lindsey
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disassembled Fan Photo from 11 Jul 1932; Bracket Oscillating Modernistic List No. 9304 from 15 Jul 1931

        image.thumb.png.9f963e0ff2d806cba8e7dfbd26823575.png

 

 

 

On 9/16/2023 at 3:21 PM, Anthony Lindsey said:

Anyone else have a stationary one of these?

            Apparently Not

Edited by Steve Rockwell
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our expert on R&M is Rick Robinson. He said his opinion:

“I bought a Modernistic once on eBay.   It was supposed to be non- oscillating but when I received it, the oscillating gear had simply been removed.  I have never actually seen a legitimate non- oscillator.  

As far as Radio fans, I do both the oscillator and a legitimate non-oscillator.”
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Steve Cunningham said:

Our expert on R&M is Rick Robinson. He said his opinion:

“I bought a Modernistic once on eBay.   It was supposed to be non- oscillating but when I received it, the oscillating gear had simply been removed.  I have never actually seen a legitimate non- oscillator.  

With all due respects to the organization, what makes Rick Robinson an expert? Does he hold actual Robbins & Myers documentation of the introduction and possible prototypes of this particular fan motor design? Better yet, lets here from Rick Robinson regarding Anthony's example, that being he's the expert. I see he is in the 21 AFCA directory. That is the last directory we have received to the best of my knowledge. I know despite my numerous efforts to benefit this organization with fan motor history; I am no expert, I just do the best I can do.

Below is from the AFCA ABOUT US "Who We Are" 

We currently have over 700 members with a wide variety of backgrounds. Our average collector has been collecting for 12 years and has at least 70 fans in their collection. We also have 20 members with 50 or more years of experience. With their friendship, knowledge, and willingness to share, all prove to be valuable assets for the Association and anyone interested in joining. The AFCA is a not‐for‐profit organization. Each new member is provided with an AFCA membership directory, access to the considerable AFCA fan history archives, and with numerous local and national meeting opportunities.

Edited by Russ Huber
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He doesn’t come on here. He plays golf and enjoys retirement. But he’s collected R&M fans for decades and has several of every model. For now, he’s the best we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

                               Is this the starting point, or a further development?

                 image.thumb.png.1a5761ab89f99ddf952ed54277d9258a.png

                                                                                            image.jpeg.14defeae0516a9a238753d0c8cc6a685.jpeg

 

                                                 Filister-head screws and all.....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

                         

                         ?

 

 

                                                         Geoff Dunaway's 1932 submission.....

     image.thumb.png.5f75f378901b55f7147b1ad882ea3bae.png

Edited by Steve Rockwell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/8/2023 at 10:11 PM, Steve Rockwell said:
  On 9/16/2023 at 3:21 PM, Anthony Lindsey said:

Anyone else have a stationary one of these?

                      There might be more...

 

                                                                     image.thumb.png.854d1c7c9e369d8fdf93e7fc155cd579.png

                                                 image.png.455f9452835a7da3c53dc98b5f30ed54.png

        Maybe you have a developmental design model, created as they elaborated and in-filled the rear guard...

 

                                           Note the rear guard's attachment to the motor frame...

                                                                and the base's orientation...

 

                Perhaps they figured that casting the grating was far easier and efficient than screening...

                           Makes me wonder all the more whether this is a developmental model.....

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                        Here's a prior Ringwald design using the same motor:

                                                               image.thumb.png.a5a53e862784dd8f70e270dab73cc8d1.png

                                image.thumb.png.364367f4b1b37a5e5ef6f7c0c3bf2eef.png

Edited by Steve Rockwell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

     And this one makes me wonder whether the same workshop was playing around with ideas later incorporated in the patent below.....

 

                                                                   image.thumb.png.d4931742666ebdfcf63a2f147a8cceb7.png

                                                                 image.thumb.png.414b21a6951fd5d4b777be63cc786e1e.png

Edited by Steve Rockwell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...